Technical Progress (Production Function)
Technical progress is defined as improvement in technology. In other words, technical progress means:
- More output can be produced from the same amount of factor inputs, or the same output can be produced by a smaller amount of one or more of the factor inputs. Or
- Any qualitative improvement in the existing product Or
- Production of entirely new products.
Technical progress is the most important factor in determining the rate of growth of the economy.
Technical Progress and Production Function:
The technical progress can be represented with the help of the production function. Here we are making use of per worker production function. The assumption of constant returns to scale permits us to write an aggregate production function into a per-worker form.
π = πΉ (πΎ, πΏ) ………. (1)
If we multiply capital and labour by any constant Ξ», then output is also multiplied by the same number, i.e. ππ = πΉ(ππΎ, ππΏ).
Let us put Ξ»=1/L, then π/πΏ = πΉ (πΎ/πΏ, 1) ………. (2)
Where,
Y/L is output per worker, and
K/L is capital-labour ratio.
Let y = Y/L and k = K/L, then equation (2) can be written as
π¦ = π (π) = πΉ (πΎ/πΏ, 1) ………. (3)
This is the per-worker form of the production function where output per worker depends upon capital per worker.
If there is no usage of inputs, the output would be zero, i.e. π¦ = π(π) if π = 0 π‘βππ π¦ = 0. It ensures that the per-worker production function starts from the origin.
Diagrammatic Representation of Per Worker Production Function:
In Fig. 1, The K/L ratio is measured on the x-axis and the Y/L ratio on the y-axis. The curve starts from the origin, as output is zero when no factor is employed. The Output per worker is increasing but at a diminishing rate as the ratio K/L ratio rises.
Technical Progress Shifts the Production Function Upward:
The technical progress shifts the production function upward. It is shown in Figure 2. The production function without any technical progress is shown by curve π(π, π‘0). After the technical progress, the curve shifts upward to π(π, π‘1). At any level of the K/L ratio on the new production function except zero, more output per worker is produced.
Factor Augmenting Representation of Technical Change:
Technical progress shifts the production function upward such that more output is produced with the same quantity of factors, i.e. without any increase in the usage of capital and labour. If the factors of production had been augmented, then the production function can be written as:
π = πΉ[π΄(π‘)πΎ, πΆ(π‘)πΏ]
Where,
Y is output
K is Capital
L is Labor
t is Time
A and C are Factors
A(t) K is Effective Capital
C(t) L is Effective Labor
Here the capital and labour force are multiplied by factors A and C, which are functions of time.
- If Θ¦(t)>0, i.e. the rate of change is positive, then effective capital stock increases as time goes on even though the actual capital stock remains constant.
- If Δ(t)>0, i.e. the rate of change is positive, then effective labour stock increases as time goes on even though the actual labour stock remains constant.
The technical change can be characterized as:
(i) Purely Capital Augmenting
The technical change is said to be purely capital augmented if Θ¦(t) is positive and C(t) is equal to 1, i.e. Θ¦(t) > 0 and C(t) = 1.
(ii) Purely Labor Augmenting
The technical change is said to be purely labour augmented if Δ(t) is positive and A(t) is equal to 1, i.e. Δ(t) > 0 and A(t) = 1.
(iii) Equally Capital and Labor Augmenting
The technical change is said to be equally capital and labour augmented if Θ¦ (t) and Δ (t) both are positive.
Classification of Technical Progress
The classification of technical progress as labour saving, capital saving or neutral was originally the work of Harrod (1948) & Hicks (1932), and there exist differences in the criteria of classification. Harrod employs the concept of capital-output ratio to explain technical progress classification, whereas Hicks used the concept of Marginal rate of Substitution between factors leaving output unchanged. Let us study them in detail.
(1). Hicks Classification of Technical Progress
a). Classification in terms of Marginal Product Ratio
β The technical progress is said to be labour saving if πππΎ(π‘)/πππΏ(π‘) > πππΏ(0)/πππΎ(0) Or Any technical progress resulting in an upward shift in the production function is said to be labour saving if any constant value of the capital-labour ratio, the ratio of πππΎ to πππΏ has increased.
β Here, πππΎ(π‘) πππ πππΏ(π‘) are the marginal products before the technical progress and πππΎ(0) πππ πππΏ(0) after the technical progress.
β The technical progress is said to be capital saving if πππΎ(π‘)/πππΏ(π‘) < πππΏ(0)/πππΎ(0) Or Any technical progress resulting in an upward shift in the production function is said to be labour-saving if any constant value of the capital-labour ratio, the ratio of πππΎ to πππΏ has decreased.
β The technical progress is said to be Hicks Neutral if πππΎ(π‘)/πππΏ(π‘) = πππΏ(0)/πππΎ(0) Or Any technical progress resulting in an upward shift in the production function is said to be labour-saving if any constant value of the capital-labour ratio, the ratio of πππΎ to πππΏ has remains constant.
Classification in terms of Ratio of Relative Shares
β The technical progress is said to be labour saving if, at any constant value of the capital-labour ratio, the ratio of relative shares, i.e. ππΎ/π€πΏ is increasing.
β The technical progress is said to be capital saving if, at any constant value of the capital-labour ratio, the ratio of relative shares, i.e. ππΎ/π€πΏ is decreasing.
β The technical progress is said to be Hicks Neutral if, at any constant value of the capital-labour ratio, the ratio of relative shares, i.e. ππΎ/π€πΏ remains constant.
(2). Hicks Classification of Technical Progress
β Any technical progress resulting in an upward shift in the production function is said to be labour-saving; if any constant value of the capital-output ratio, the πππΎ is increasing. In other words, technical progress is said to be labour saving if, at any constant value of the capital-output ratio, the ratio of relative shares, i.e. ππΎ/π€πΏ is increasing.
β Any technical progress resulting in an upward shift in the production function is said to be capital saving; if any constant value of the capital-output ratio, the πππΎ is decreasing. In other words, technical progress is said to be capital saving if, at any constant value of the capital-output ratio, the ratio of relative shares, i.e. ππΎ/π€πΏ is decreasing.
β Any technical progress resulting in an upward shift in the production function is said to be Harrod neutral; if any constant value of the capital-output ratio, the πππΎ remains unchanged. In other words, technical progress is said to be Harrod neutral if, at any constant value of the capital-output ratio, the ratio of relative shares, i.e. ππΎ/π€πΏ remains constant.
Read More- Microeconomics
- Microeconomics: Definition, Meaning and Scope
- Methods of Analysis in Economics
- Problem of Choice & Production Possibility Curve
- Concept of Market & Market Mechanism in Economics
- Concept of Demand and Supply in Economics
- Concept of Equilibrium & Dis-equilibrium in Economics
- Cardinal Utility Theory: Concept, Assumptions, Equilibrium & Drawbacks
- Ordinal Utility Theory: Meaning & Assumptions
- Indifference Curve: Concept, Properties & Shapes
- Budget Line: Concept & Explanation
- Consumer Equilibrium: Ordinal Approach, Income & Price Consumption Curve
- Applications of Indifference Curve
- Measuring Effects of Income & Excise Taxes and Income & Excise Subsidies
- Normal Goods: Income & Substitution Effects
- Inferior Goods: Income & Substitution Effects
- Giffen Paradox or Giffen Goods: Income & Substitution Effects
- Concept of Elasticity: Demand & Supply
- Demand Elasticity: Price Elasticity, Income Elasticity & Cross Elasticity
- Determinants of Price Elasticity of Demand
- Measuring Price Elasticity of Demand
- Price Elasticity of Supply and Its Determinants
- Revealed Preference Theory of Samuelson: Concept, Assumptions & Explanation
- Hicks’s Revision of Demand Theory
- Choice Involving Risk and Uncertainty
- Inter Temporal Choice: Budget Constraint & Consumer Preferences
- Theories in Demand Analysis
- Elementary Theory of Price Determination: Demand, Supply & Equilibrium Price
- Cobweb Model: Concept, Theorem and Lagged Adjustments in Interrelated Markets
- Production Function: Concept, Assumptions & Law of Diminishing Return
- Isoquant: Assumptions and Properties
- Isoquant Map and Economic Region of Production
- Elasticity of Technical Substitution
- Law of Returns to Scale
- Production Function and Returns to Scale
- Eulerβs Theorem and Product Exhaustion Theorem
- Technical Progress (Production Function)
- Multi-Product Firm and Production Possibility Curve
- Concept of Production Function
- Cobb Douglas Production Function
- CES Production Function
- VES Production Function
- Translog Production Function
- Concepts of Costs: Private, Social, Explicit, Implicit and Opportunity
- Traditional Theory of Costs: Short Run
- Traditional Theory of Costs: Long Run
- Modern Theory Of Cost: Short-run and Long-run
- Modern Theory Of Cost: Short Run
- Modern Theory Of Cost: Long Run
- Empirical Evidences on the Shape of Cost Curves
- Derivation of Short-Run Average and Marginal Cost Curves From Total Cost Curves
- Cost Curves In The Long-Run: LRAC and LRMC
- Economies of Scope
- The Learning Curve
- Perfect Competition: Meaning and Assumptions
- Perfect Competition: Pricing and Output Decisions
- Perfect Competition: Demand Curve
- Perfect Competition Equilibrium: Short Run and Long Run
- Monopoly: Meaning, Characteristics and Equilibrium (Short-run & Long-run)
- Multi-Plant Monopoly
- Deadweight Loss in Monopoly
- Welfare Aspects of Monopoly
- Price Discrimination under Monopoly: Types, Degree and Equilibrium
- Monopolistic Competition: Concept, Characteristics and Criticism
- Excess Capacity: Concept and Explanation
- Difference Between Perfect Competition and Monopolistic Competition
- Oligopoly Market: Concept, Types and Characteristics
- Difference Between Oligopoly Market and Monopolistic Market
- Oligopoly: Collusive Models- Cartel & Price Leadership
- Oligopoly: Non-Collusive Models- Cournot, Stackelberg, Bertrand, Sweezy or Kinked Demand Curve
- Monopsony Market Structure
- Bilateral Monopoly Market Structure
- Workable Competition in Market: Meaning and Explanation
- Baumolβs Sales Revenue Maximization Model
- Williamsonβs Model of Managerial Discretion
- Robin Marris Model of Managerial Enterprise
- Hall and Hitch Full Cost Pricing Theory
- Andrewβs Full Cost Pricing Theory
- Bainβs Model of Limit Pricing
- Sylos Labiniβs Model of Limit Pricing
- Behavioural Theory of Cyert and March
- Game Theory: Concept, Application, and Example
- Prisonerβs Dilemma: Concept and Example