Euler’s Theorem and Product Exhaustion Theorem

The product exhaustion theorem states that if all the factors of production are paid equal to their marginal products, they will exhaust the total product. As soon as it was brought forward that all the factors of production are paid equal to their marginal products, a difficult problem cropped up over, which raised a serious debate among the economists.

The difficult problem that has been put forward was that if all factors were paid equal to their marginal products, would the total product be just exactly exhausted?

The problem of proving that if all factors are paid rewards equal to their marginal products, they will exhaust the total product has been called the “Adding- up Problem” or Product Exhaustion Problem. Philip Wicksteed was the first economist who not only posed this problem but also provided a solution for it.

Solution of Product Exhaustion Theorem:

The three solutions proposed for the problem of the product exhaustion theorem were:

  • a) Philip Wicksteed Solution: Euler’s Theorem
  • b) Wicksell, Walras and Barone’s Solution
  • c) J.R. Hicks and R.A. Samuleson: Perfect Competition Model

a) Philip Wicksteed Solution: Euler’s Theorem

Philip Wicksteed was the first economist who proposed this problem and provided a solution using Euler’s Theorem. Euler’s Theorem is a mathematical proposition which states that if a production function is homogeneous of degree one (i.e. Constant Returns to Scale) and the factors are paid equal to their marginal products, the total product is exhausted with no surplus and deficit.

Euler’s Theorem:

Euler’s Theorem was developed by Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler. According to him, it is a mathematical relationship that applies to any homogeneous function.

A function f(x) is said to be homogenous of degree t (scalar), if and only if, for 𝑓(λx) = λt𝑓(𝑥), for all λ > 0 and 𝑥 = (𝑥1, 𝑥2, ….., 𝑥𝑛).

Here, t is the parameter of returns to scale.

  • If the function f(x) is homogeneous of degree α = 1, the function exhibits constant returns to scale.
  • If α > 1, the function exhibits increasing returns to scale.
  • If α < 1, the function exhibits decreasing returns to scale.

Let f(x) be a production function with two factors of production of capital and labour. Then the homogeneous production function of degree t can be mathematically expressed as:

λt 𝑌 = 𝑓 [λK, λL]

Where,

Y is output

K is capital

t is the parameter of returns to scale.

  • If t = 1, the function exhibits constant returns to scale.
  • If t > 1, the function exhibits increasing returns to scale.
  • If t < 1, the function exhibits decreasing returns to scale.

If the production function is homogeneous of degree t, then

  1. The Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution is constant along rays extending from the origin and
  2. The derived cost function from the corresponding production function is homogeneous of degree 1/α.

Euler’s Theorem

The theorem says that for a homogeneous function f(x) of degree t, then for all x

𝑥1. 𝜕𝑓(𝑥)/𝜕𝑥1 + 𝑥2. 𝜕𝑓(𝑥)/𝜕𝑥2 + 𝑥3. 𝜕𝑓(𝑥)/𝜕𝑥3 ⋯ + 𝑥𝑛. 𝜕𝑓(𝑥)/𝜕𝑥𝑛 = 𝑡𝑓(𝑥)

Proof: For a homogeneous function f(x) of degree t,

𝑑𝑓(𝜆𝑥)/𝑑𝜆 = 𝑥1. 𝑑𝑓(𝜆𝑥)/𝜕𝜆𝑥1 + 𝑥2. 𝑑𝑓(𝜆𝑥)/𝜕𝜆𝑥2 + 𝑥3. 𝑑𝑓(𝜆𝑥)/𝜕𝜆𝑥3 ⋯ + 𝑥𝑛. 𝑑𝑓(𝜆𝑥)/𝜕𝜆𝑥𝑛

𝑑𝜆𝑡𝑓(𝑥)/𝑑𝑡 = 𝑡.𝜆𝑡−1𝑓(𝑥)

If setting λ=1, the theorem follows.

Euler’s Theorem and Production Function:

It is based on some postulations. These are:

  1. It assumes a standardized linear production of the first degree, which implies invariable returns to scale.
  2. It assumes that the factors are complementary, i.e. if a variable factor increases, it increases the marginal productivity of the fixed factor.
  3. It assumes that factors of production are perfectly divisible.
  4. The relative shares of the factors are invariable and independent of the level of the product.
  5. There is a stationary, reckless economy where there are no profits.
  6. There is perfect competition.
  7. It is applicable only in the long run.

Let us assume that the production function is homogeneous of degree 1. The homogeneous production function of the first degree can be written as:

λ𝑌 = 𝑓 [λK, λL]

And the Euler’s Theorem can be written as:

𝑌 = 𝐾. 𝜕𝑌/𝜕𝐾 + 𝐿. 𝜕𝑌/𝜕𝐿

Where,

Y: Output

K: Capital

L: Labour

𝜕𝑌/𝜕𝐾: Marginal Product of Capital

𝜕𝑌/𝜕𝐿: Marginal Product of Labor

The marginal product of capital is the addition to the total output attributable to the addition of one more unit of capital. It is calculated by partially differentiating output with respect to capital, keeping labour constant.

Similarly, the Marginal product of labour is the addition to the total output attributable to the addition of one more unit of labour. It is calculated by partially differentiating output with respect to labour, keeping capital constant.

Euler’s theorem states that the marginal product of capital multiplied by the amount of capital plus the marginal product of labour multiplied by the amount of labour equals to the total product of the firm.

𝑌 = 𝑓(𝐾, 𝐿, 𝐴) = 𝐴𝐾𝛼𝐿1−𝛼

𝑀𝑃𝐾 = 𝜕𝑌/𝜕𝐾 = 𝐴𝛼𝐾𝛼−1𝐿1−𝛼 = 𝐴𝛼 (𝐾/𝐿)𝛼−1

𝑀𝑃𝐿 = 𝜕𝑌/𝜕𝐿 = 𝐴(1 − 𝛼)𝐾𝛼𝐿−𝛼 = 𝐴(1 − 𝛼) (𝐾/𝐿)𝛼

Putting the values in Euler’s theorem, Y=K. MPk + L. MPL, we get

𝑌 = 𝐴𝛼𝐾𝛼−1𝐿1−𝛼𝐾 + 𝐿𝐴(1 − 𝛼)𝐾𝛼𝐿−𝛼

𝑌 = 𝐴𝛼𝐾𝛼𝐿1−𝛼 + 𝐴(1 − 𝛼)𝐾𝛼𝐿1−𝛼

𝑌 = 𝐴𝐾𝛼𝐿1−𝛼

If the production function is homogeneous of degree 1, then marginal products are homogeneous of degree zero.

Y = K. MPK + L. MPL or K. FK + L. FL

Differentiate with respect to K,

K. FKK + L. FLK + FK = FK

K. FKK + L. FLK = 0. FK = 0

Similarly, the same is true for labour.

We have seen that Wicksteed is able to explain the product exhaustion theorem with the help of Euler’s theorem when the production function exhibits constant returns to scale. Wicksteed proved that if all the factors are paid equal to their marginal products, the total product will be exhausted.

Wicksteed’s Solution and Criticism

i. First drawback of Wicksteed’s Solution:

Wicksteed was able to explain the product exhaustion theorem with the help of Euler’s theorem. But this solution was criticized by Walras, Edge worth, Barone and Pareto. According to them, returns to scale are not constant in the real world, i.e. production function is not homogeneous of degree one.

Edgeworth commented on Wicksteed’s solution that “there is a magnificence in this generalization which recalls the youth of philosophy. Justice is a perfect cube, said the ancient sage, and rational conduct is homogeneous function, adds the modern savant”.

Economists pointed out that the production function is such that it yields a long-run average cost curve which is ‘U’ shaped. LAC curve is also known as the “envelope curve” as it envelopes short-run average cost curves.

The long-run average cost curve is U-shaped, i.e. it initially falls, reaches a minimum and rises thereafter. Initially, the long-run average cost of production falls as output increases because of increasing returns to scale and then rises beyond a certain level of output because of decreasing returns to scale. So, if a firm is working with increasing returns to scale and factors are paid equal to their marginal products, the total factor reward would exceed the total product.

And similarly, if a firm is working with decreasing returns to scale and factors are paid equal to their marginal products, the total factor reward would not fully exhaust the total product. As the total factor reward is less than the total product, it would result in a surplus. So, Euler’s theorem does not apply when firms are working with either increasing returns to scale or decreasing returns to scale.

ii. Second drawback of Wicksteed’s Solution:

If the production function exhibits constant returns to scale, then the shape of the long-run average cost curve would be a horizontal straight line parallel to the x-axis. The horizontal straight-line shape of the long-run average cost is not compatible with the perfectly competitive market structure, as the firm would not be able to determine the equilibrium position.

a. Wicksell, Walras and Barone’s Solution to Product Exhaustion Problem:

After Wicksteed, the more satisfactory solution to the problem of the product exhaustion theorem was provided independently by Wicksell, Barone and Walras. They assumed that-

  • The production function was not homogeneous of degree one.
  • The production function was such that it yielded a long-run average cost curve to be of a ‘U’ shape.

They pointed out the applicability of the product exhaustion theorem in the long run in a perfect competition market. In a perfect competition market, the industry is in equilibrium in the long run when all the firms are in equilibrium and producing a price which is equal to a minimum of the long-run average cost. In the long run, all the firms are earning zero economic profit, and no firm has the incentive to enter or leave an industry.

Thus, the condition required for the product exhaustion theorem, i.e. production function exhibits constant returns to scale, was fulfilled at the minimum point on the long run average cost curve where returns to scale are constant within the range of small variations of output.

So, under perfectly competitive long-run equilibrium, if factors are paid rewards equal to their marginal product, the total product would be exactly exhausted.

b. Hicks and Samuelson Solution to Product Exhaustion Theorem:

We have seen that Wicksell, Barone, and Walras pointed out the applicability of the product exhaustion theorem in the case of a long-run perfectly competitive equilibrium. And Wicksteed provided a solution to the product exhaustion theorem with the help of Euler’s theorem and assumed a linearly homogeneous production function.

But as all production functions are not linear homogeneous, the controversy remained unresolved. It does not make any difference whether we are under a perfectly competitive market structure and dealing with the usual ‘U’ shaped long-run average cost curve; the controversy remained unresolved.

Hicks and Samuelson resolved this controversy and showed that the solution of the product exhaustion theorem depends not on the property of production function but on the market conditions of perfect competition.

In a perfect competition market structure, firms are earning zero economic profits. Thus the solution to the product exhaustion problem in the case of perfectly competitive factor markets where factors are paid equal to their marginal products, the existence of perfect competition in the product market will ensure zero economic profits in the long run.

Long run Equilibrium: In perfect competition market structure, firms are earning zero economic profits
Figure 1: Long run Equilibrium: In perfect competition market structure, firms are earning zero economic profits

The zero economic profit condition under perfect competition can also be explained mathematically. The zero economic profit condition implies that the value of total output is equal to the total cost of production.

Let capital (K) and labour (L) be the two factors of production used by perfectly competitive firms to produce output (Q). Let P be the price of the product. The value of output is AR multiplied by the output. And total cost is the sum of the amount spent on each to produce a given level of output.

So, Zero Economic Profit » Value of Output = Total Cost

𝑃. 𝑄 = 𝐿. 𝑤 + 𝐾. 𝑟 … … . (1)

According to marginal productivity theory, each factor is paid equal to the value of their marginal products. Thus,

𝑤 = 𝑉𝑀𝑃𝐿 = 𝑃𝑥𝑀𝑃𝑃𝐿

𝑟 = 𝑉𝑀𝑃𝐾 = 𝑃𝑥𝑀𝑃𝑃𝐾

Where VMP is the value of the marginal product.

Now substitute these values of r and w in equation (1), and we get

𝑃. 𝑄 = 𝐿. 𝑃. 𝑀𝑃𝑃𝐿 + 𝐾. 𝑃. 𝑀𝑃𝑃𝐾

It shows that for a given price, if the factors are paid equal to their marginal physical product, the total payments to factors would be equal to the total product Q, and thus total product would be exactly exhausted.

Read More- Microeconomics

  1. Microeconomics: Definition, Meaning and Scope
  2. Methods of Analysis in Economics
  3. Problem of Choice & Production Possibility Curve
  4. Concept of Market & Market Mechanism in Economics
  5. Concept of Demand and Supply in Economics
  6. Concept of Equilibrium & Dis-equilibrium in Economics
  7. Cardinal Utility Theory: Concept, Assumptions, Equilibrium & Drawbacks
  8. Ordinal Utility Theory: Meaning & Assumptions
  9. Indifference Curve: Concept, Properties & Shapes
  10. Budget Line: Concept & Explanation
  11. Consumer Equilibrium: Ordinal Approach, Income & Price Consumption Curve
  12. Applications of Indifference Curve
  13. Measuring Effects of Income & Excise Taxes and Income & Excise Subsidies
  14. Normal Goods: Income & Substitution Effects
  15. Inferior Goods: Income & Substitution Effects
  16. Giffen Paradox or Giffen Goods: Income & Substitution Effects
  17. Concept of Elasticity: Demand & Supply
  18. Demand Elasticity: Price Elasticity, Income Elasticity & Cross Elasticity
  19. Determinants of Price Elasticity of Demand
  20. Measuring Price Elasticity of Demand
  21. Price Elasticity of Supply and Its Determinants
  22. Revealed Preference Theory of Samuelson: Concept, Assumptions & Explanation
  23. Hicks’s Revision of Demand Theory
  24. Choice Involving Risk and Uncertainty
  25. Inter Temporal Choice: Budget Constraint & Consumer Preferences
  26. Theories in Demand Analysis
  27. Elementary Theory of Price Determination: Demand, Supply & Equilibrium Price
  28. Cobweb Model: Concept, Theorem and Lagged Adjustments in Interrelated Markets
  29. Production Function: Concept, Assumptions & Law of Diminishing Return
  30. Isoquant: Assumptions and Properties
  31. Isoquant Map and Economic Region of Production
  32. Elasticity of Technical Substitution
  33. Law of Returns to Scale
  34. Production Function and Returns to Scale
  35. Euler’s Theorem and Product Exhaustion Theorem
  36. Technical Progress (Production Function)
  37. Multi-Product Firm and Production Possibility Curve
  38. Concept of Production Function
  39. Cobb Douglas Production Function
  40. CES Production Function
  41. VES Production Function
  42. Translog Production Function
  43. Concepts of Costs: Private, Social, Explicit, Implicit and Opportunity
  44. Traditional Theory of Costs: Short Run
  45. Traditional Theory of Costs: Long Run
  46. Modern Theory Of Cost: Short-run and Long-run
  47. Modern Theory Of Cost: Short Run
  48. Modern Theory Of Cost: Long Run
  49. Empirical Evidences on the Shape of Cost Curves
  50. Derivation of Short-Run Average and Marginal Cost Curves From Total Cost Curves
  51. Cost Curves In The Long-Run: LRAC and LRMC
  52. Economies of Scope
  53. The Learning Curve
  54. Perfect Competition: Meaning and Assumptions
  55. Perfect Competition: Pricing and Output Decisions
  56. Perfect Competition: Demand Curve
  57. Perfect Competition Equilibrium: Short Run and Long Run
  58. Monopoly: Meaning, Characteristics and Equilibrium (Short-run & Long-run)
  59. Multi-Plant Monopoly
  60. Deadweight Loss in Monopoly
  61. Welfare Aspects of Monopoly
  62. Price Discrimination under Monopoly: Types, Degree and Equilibrium
  63. Monopolistic Competition: Concept, Characteristics and Criticism
  64. Excess Capacity: Concept and Explanation
  65. Difference Between Perfect Competition and Monopolistic Competition
  66. Oligopoly Market: Concept, Types and Characteristics
  67. Difference Between Oligopoly Market and Monopolistic Market
  68. Oligopoly: Collusive Models- Cartel & Price Leadership
  69. Oligopoly: Non-Collusive Models- Cournot, Stackelberg, Bertrand, Sweezy or Kinked Demand Curve
  70. Monopsony Market Structure
  71. Bilateral Monopoly Market Structure
  72. Workable Competition in Market: Meaning and Explanation
  73. Baumol’s Sales Revenue Maximization Model
  74. Williamson’s Model of Managerial Discretion
  75. Robin Marris Model of Managerial Enterprise
  76. Hall and Hitch Full Cost Pricing Theory
  77. Andrew’s Full Cost Pricing Theory
  78. Bain’s Model of Limit Pricing
  79. Sylos Labini’s Model of Limit Pricing
  80. Behavioural Theory of Cyert and March
  81. Game Theory: Concept, Application, and Example
  82. Prisoner’s Dilemma: Concept and Example

Share Your Thoughts