Samuelson’s Model of Public Expenditure
With The help of Samuelson’s model, it is shown that government intervention is necessary for the efficient provision of public goods.
Samuelson’s Theory of Public Expenditure
The formal analysis of public goods began with Samuelson (1954), who derived the rule depicting efficient levels of provision of public goods. He tried to explain the efficient provision of pure public good and the role of government in its provision. The rule for efficient provision is typically called the Samuelson rule.
The following analysis will derive the Samuelson rule for a pure public good.
Pure Public Good:
To derive the efficiency rule for a pure public good, it is assumed that there is available a single public good and, initially, that disposal is not possible. The latter assumption implies that all households must consume a quantity of the public good equal to its supply. The extension of too many public goods is simple.
The economy consists of H households, indexed h = 1, …, H. Each household has a utility function:
𝑈ℎ = 𝑉ℎ (𝑥ℎ, 𝐺)
where 𝑥ℎ is the consumption of household h of private goods, and G is the supply of the public good.
The fact that total supply, G, appears in all households’ utility functions indicates that the public good is pure. It is assumed that the combinations of 𝑥ℎ, h = 1, …, H, and G that the economy can produce are constrained by production possibilities. The implicit representation of the production set is written:
𝐹 (𝑥, 𝐺) ≤ 0
𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒, 𝑥 = ∑𝐻ℎ=1 𝑥ℎ
To characterise the set of Pareto efficient allocations, the government chooses 𝑥ℎ, h = 1, …, H, and G to maximise the utility level of the first household, constrained by the requirement that households 2 to H obtain given utility levels and by production possibilities. Varying the given utility levels for households 2 to H traces out the set of Pareto efficient allocations.
The Lagrangian for this maximisation problem can be written:
where 𝑈ℎ is the utility level that must be achieved by h = 2, …, H.
Assuming that the specified utility levels can be reached simultaneously, the necessary condition describing the choice of a component 𝑥ℎ, i from 𝑥ℎ is:
with 𝜇ℎ ≡ 1 for h = 1. At an optimum, the above equation holds for all i = 1, …, n.
For the choice of the level of public good, forming the Lagrangian and optimising with respect to G gives:
which is the marginal rate of substitution between the public good and the 𝑖𝑡ℎ private good for the 𝐻𝑡ℎ household. The right-hand side of the above equation is the marginal rate of transformation between the public good and private good i.
The above equation can thus be written as:
This equation is the Samuelson rule, which states that Pareto efficient provision of the public good occurs when the marginal rate of transformation between the public good and each private good is equated to the sum, over all households, of the marginal rates of substitution.
The difference between optimal allocations of public goods and private goods occurs due to the fact that an extra unit of public goods increases the utility of all households so that the social benefit of this additional unit is found by summing the marginal benefit, measured by the MRS, to individual households.
At an optimum, this is equated to the marginal cost given by the marginal rate of transformation. In contrast, an extra unit of private good only increases the welfare of its single recipient, and an optimum occurs when marginal benefits are equal across households and to marginal cost.
Two points must be noted in the interpretation of this result:
Firstly, although non-excludability has been adopted as a defining characteristic of pure public good, it played no role in the derivation of the Samuelson rule. In fact, the optimal level of provision is not dependent on the degree of excludability. Instead, excludability is only relevant for determining feasible provision mechanisms.
Secondly, although the Samuelson rule is simple, attention should be given to the fact that it can be easily implemented. In order to derive the rule, it was assumed that the government had complete control over the allocation of resources. Equivalently, the government could employ lump-sum taxation to redistribute income and to finance the provision of the public good.
Read More in: Theory of Public Finance
- Public Finance: Meaning, Nature & Scope
- Role of Government in Economy
- Role of Government in Mixed Economy: Public & Private Sector
- Role of Government under Cooperation and Competition
- Role of Government in Economic Development and Planning
- Concept of Public Goods, Private Goods, and Merit Goods
- Concept of Market Failure and Functions of Government
- Market Failure and Functions of Government: Decreasing Costs
- Market Failure and Functions of Government: Externalities
- Market Failure and Functions of Government: Public Goods
- Future Market: Meaning, Role & Uncertainty
- Concept of Information Asymmetry
- Theory of Second Best: Concept & Explanation
- Problem of Allocation of Resources: Public & Private Mechanisms
- Preferences: Meaning, Types & Problems of Preference Revelation
- Preference Aggregation & Its Mechanism
- Voting Systems, Direct Democracy, Representative Democracy, Leviathan Hypothesis & Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem
- Economic Theory of Democracy: Concept & Explanation
- Politico Eco Bureaucracy: Concept & Explanation
- Rent-Seeking and Directly Unproductive Profit-Seeking Activities
- Rationale for Public Goods: Concept & Explanation
- Benefit Theory or Voluntary Exchange Theory
- Lindahl Model: Concept, Equilibrium & Limitations
- Bowen Model: Concept, Advantages & Limitations
- Samuelson’s Model of Public Expenditure
- Musgrave’s Model of Public Expenditures
- Demand Revealing Schemes for Public Goods
- Vickery-Clarke-Groves Mechanism
- Groves-Ledyard Mechanism
- Tiebout Model: Concept, Assumptions Equilibrium & Simple Tiebout Model
- Theory of Club Goods
- Keynesian Principles of Stabilization Policy
- Difference Between Keynesian Economic Thought and Others
- Role of Expectations and Uncertainty in Formulating Stabilization Policy
- Intertemporal Markets Efficiency & Failure
- Liquidity Preference Theory
- Diamond-Dybvig Banking Model
- Preference Shocks, Adverse Selection & Central Bank
- Equilibrium Deposit Contract
- Social Goods and Its Effect on Stabilization Policy
- Effect of Infrastructural Facilities on Stabilization Policy
- Effect of Distributional Inequality on Stabilization Policy
- Effect of Regional Imbalances on Stabilization Policy
- Wagner’s Law of Increasing State Activities: Explanation, Graph & Criticism
- Peacock-Wiseman Hypothesis: Explanation, Graph & Criticism
- Public Expenditure: Concept, Objectives, & Public vs Private Expenditure
- Pure Theory of Public Expenditure
- Structure & Growth of Public Expenditure in India
- Trends, Lessons & Priorities in Public Expenditure in India
- Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: Project Evaluation, Estimation of Costs & Discount Rate
- Performance Based Budgeting and Zero Based Budgeting
- Theories of Tax Incidence: Concentration Theory, Diffusion Theory & Modern Theory
- Tax System and Its Principles
- Equity Principle and Efficiency Principle of Taxation: Meaning, Explanation & Examples
- Ability to Pay and Benefits Received Principle of Taxation
- Theory of Optimal Taxation: Excess Burden & Distortions of Taxation
- Deadweight Loss of Taxation: Causes, Measurement & Example
- Concept of Equity & Efficiency in Economics
- Trade-Off Between Equity and Efficiency: Meaning & Example
- Theory of Measurement of Dead Weight Loss
- Double Taxation: Meaning, Desirability, Forms & Solution
- Solution to Problem of Double Taxation: Intra-Country & International
- Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) and Indian Policy
- Classical View on Public Debt
- Compensatory Aspect of Public Debt Policy
- Public Debt or Borrowings: Concept, Need, Sources & Types
- Concept of Public Debt or Public Borrowings
- Need for Public Debt or Public Borrowing
- Sources of Public Debt
- Classification of Public Debt
- Burden of Public Debt: Meaning, Types & Explanation
- Debt Through Created Money or Deficit Financing
- Public Debt (Public Borrowings) and Inflation (Price Level)
- Crowding Out of Private Investment and Activity
- Principle of Public Debt Management and Debt Repayment