Vickery-Clarke-Groves Mechanism: Concept & Explanation
In 1972, Edward H Clarke introduced a taxation scheme for consumers to reveal their true preferences for public goods. In this mechanism, everyone truthfully reveals their preferences even if they are not required to do so.
Clarke’s demand scheme, also called as the pivotal mechanism, which gives each user of the public good the choice of either to leave the outcome as it is or change its cost equal to the net loss of others.
He explained this concept with the help of the quasi-linear utility function. The Vickery-Clarke-Groves mechanism is a direct quasilinear mechanism (x,p) where,
X(ѵ) = argx ∑i v(x)
P(v) = ∑j ≠ 1vj (x (v-i)- ) = ∑ j ≠ 1vj (x(v)
This equation can be explained with the help of the following example.
The government has decided to install a number of public benches in the town. There are three beneficiaries, X, Y, and Z, with four alternatives available, n=0,1,2,3, where n is the number of public benches. The government’s objective is to provide good-quality benches to the people living in the town.
Total benefits and costs:
Number of Public Benches | ||||
Resident | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
X | 0 | 60 | 90 | 155 |
Y | 0 | 80 | 120 | 140 |
Z | 0 | 120 | 200 | 360 |
Social Net Benefit | 0 | 140 | 170 | 155 |
As the social net benefit is maximum at 2, that is the socially efficient number.
Net benefits with an equal cost share:
Number of Public Benches | ||||
Resident | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
X | 0 | 20 | 10 | 35 |
Y | 0 | 40 | 40 | 20 |
Z | 0 | 80 | 120 | 100 |
Social Net Benefit | 0 | 140 | 170 | 155 |
If n= 1, the total cost is 120. Hence, the cost share for each is 40. The private net benefit for X is then 60-40=20. Similarly, for Y and Z and n = 2, 3.
Now, this example is being explained when the Groves and Clarke tax is being applied.
Groves-Clarke Taxes
Person X
Number of Public Benches | ||||
Resident | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
X | 0 | 20 | 10 | 35 |
Y | 0 | 40 | 40 | 20 |
Z | 0 | 80 | 120 | 100 |
Social Net Benefit | 0 | 140 | 170 | 155 |
Number of Public Benches | ||||
Resident | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Y | 0 | 40 | 40 | 20 |
Z | 0 | 80 | 120 | 100 |
Social Net Benefit | 0 | 120 | 60 | 120 |
Person X is not playing an important role. Without him, the net benefit is maximum at n=2. With him, the net benefit is maximum at n=2. So, his tax is zero.
Person Y
Number of Public Benches | ||||
Resident | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
X | 0 | 20 | 10 | 35 |
Y | 0 | 40 | 40 | 20 |
Z | 0 | 80 | 120 | 100 |
Social Net Benefit | 0 | 140 | 170 | 155 |
Number of Public Benches | ||||
Resident | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
X | 0 | 20 | 10 | 35 |
Z | 0 | 80 | 120 | 100 |
Social Net Benefit | 0 | 100 | 130 | 135 |
Person Y, however, is playing an important role. With him, the net benefit is maximum at n=2. Without him, the net benefit is maximum at n=3. Y tax is, therefore, the difference between the sum of net benefits of others at n=3 and the sum of net benefits of others at n=2, i.e. 135-130=5.
Y is paying the tax because his report changes the decision from n=3 to n=2.
Person Z
Number of Public Benches | ||||
Resident | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
X | 0 | 20 | 10 | 35 |
Y | 0 | 40 | 40 | 20 |
Z | 0 | 80 | 120 | 100 |
Social Net Benefit | 0 | 140 | 170 | 155 |
Number of Public Benches | ||||
Resident | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
X | 0 | 20 | 10 | 35 |
Y | 0 | 40 | 40 | 20 |
Social Net Benefit | 0 | 60 | 50 | 55 |
Person Z is also playing an important role. With him, the net benefit is maximum at n=2. Without him, the net benefit is maximum at n=1. Z tax is, however, the sum of others benefits at n=1, and the sum of others benefits at n=2, i.e., 60-50= 10.
Net benefits with taxes:
Number of Public Benches | |||||
Resident | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | Tax |
X | 0 | 20 | 10 | 35 | 0 |
Y | 0 | 40 | 40 | 20 | 5 |
Z | 0 | 80 | 120 | 100 | 10 |
Social Net Benefit | 0 | 140 | 170 | 155 |
Post-tax net benefit from this scheme is 10, for X 40-5= 35, for Y, 120-10= 110 for Z.
Incentives for truthful revelation:
Number of Public Benches | ||||
Resident | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
X | 0 | 20 | 10 | 70 |
Y | 0 | 40 | 40 | 20 |
Z | 0 | 80 | 120 | 100 |
Social Net Benefit | 0 | 140 | 170 | 190 |
It is to be noted that X net benefit is maximum at n=3.
Number of Public Benches | ||||
Resident | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
X | 0 | 20 | 10 | 70 |
Y | 0 | 40 | 40 | 20 |
Z | 0 | 80 | 120 | 100 |
Social Net Benefit | 0 | 140 | 170 | 190 |
Number of Public Benches | ||||
Resident | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Y | 0 | 40 | 40 | 20 |
Z | 0 | 80 | 120 | 100 |
Social Net Benefit | 0 | 120 | 160 | 120 |
X’s role is very important. Without him, the sum of net benefits is maximum at n=2. His report will change the decision from n=2 to n=3. So he has to pay the tax, which will be equal to 160-120=40. If X lies and does not report truly, then the net benefit from n=3- tax. Therefore 35-40=-5. If X truly reports, then the net benefit will be 10. Thus, no point arises that X should tell a lie.
Thus, this was the VCG mechanism (Vickery-Clarke-Groves) mechanism for public goods.
Read More in: Theory of Public Finance
- Public Finance: Meaning, Nature & Scope
- Role of Government in Economy
- Role of Government in Mixed Economy: Public & Private Sector
- Role of Government under Cooperation and Competition
- Role of Government in Economic Development and Planning
- Concept of Public Goods, Private Goods, and Merit Goods
- Concept of Market Failure and Functions of Government
- Market Failure and Functions of Government: Decreasing Costs
- Market Failure and Functions of Government: Externalities
- Market Failure and Functions of Government: Public Goods
- Future Market: Meaning, Role & Uncertainty
- Concept of Information Asymmetry
- Theory of Second Best: Concept & Explanation
- Problem of Allocation of Resources: Public & Private Mechanisms
- Preferences: Meaning, Types & Problems of Preference Revelation
- Preference Aggregation & Its Mechanism
- Voting Systems, Direct Democracy, Representative Democracy, Leviathan Hypothesis & Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem
- Economic Theory of Democracy: Concept & Explanation
- Politico Eco Bureaucracy: Concept & Explanation
- Rent-Seeking and Directly Unproductive Profit-Seeking Activities
- Rationale for Public Goods: Concept & Explanation
- Benefit Theory or Voluntary Exchange Theory
- Lindahl Model: Concept, Equilibrium & Limitations
- Bowen Model: Concept, Advantages & Limitations
- Samuelson’s Model of Public Expenditure
- Musgrave’s Model of Public Expenditures
- Demand Revealing Schemes for Public Goods
- Vickery-Clarke-Groves Mechanism
- Groves-Ledyard Mechanism
- Tiebout Model: Concept, Assumptions Equilibrium & Simple Tiebout Model
- Theory of Club Goods
- Keynesian Principles of Stabilization Policy
- Difference Between Keynesian Economic Thought and Others
- Role of Expectations and Uncertainty in Formulating Stabilization Policy
- Intertemporal Markets Efficiency & Failure
- Liquidity Preference Theory
- Diamond-Dybvig Banking Model
- Preference Shocks, Adverse Selection & Central Bank
- Equilibrium Deposit Contract
- Social Goods and Its Effect on Stabilization Policy
- Effect of Infrastructural Facilities on Stabilization Policy
- Effect of Distributional Inequality on Stabilization Policy
- Effect of Regional Imbalances on Stabilization Policy
- Wagner’s Law of Increasing State Activities: Explanation, Graph & Criticism
- Peacock-Wiseman Hypothesis: Explanation, Graph & Criticism
- Public Expenditure: Concept, Objectives, & Public vs Private Expenditure
- Pure Theory of Public Expenditure
- Structure & Growth of Public Expenditure in India
- Trends, Lessons & Priorities in Public Expenditure in India
- Social Cost-Benefit Analysis: Project Evaluation, Estimation of Costs & Discount Rate
- Performance Based Budgeting and Zero Based Budgeting
- Theories of Tax Incidence: Concentration Theory, Diffusion Theory & Modern Theory
- Tax System and Its Principles
- Equity Principle and Efficiency Principle of Taxation: Meaning, Explanation & Examples
- Ability to Pay and Benefits Received Principle of Taxation
- Theory of Optimal Taxation: Excess Burden & Distortions of Taxation
- Deadweight Loss of Taxation: Causes, Measurement & Example
- Concept of Equity & Efficiency in Economics
- Trade-Off Between Equity and Efficiency: Meaning & Example
- Theory of Measurement of Dead Weight Loss
- Double Taxation: Meaning, Desirability, Forms & Solution
- Solution to Problem of Double Taxation: Intra-Country & International
- Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) and Indian Policy
- Classical View on Public Debt
- Compensatory Aspect of Public Debt Policy
- Public Debt or Borrowings: Concept, Need, Sources & Types
- Concept of Public Debt or Public Borrowings
- Need for Public Debt or Public Borrowing
- Sources of Public Debt
- Classification of Public Debt
- Burden of Public Debt: Meaning, Types & Explanation
- Debt Through Created Money or Deficit Financing
- Public Debt (Public Borrowings) and Inflation (Price Level)
- Crowding Out of Private Investment and Activity
- Principle of Public Debt Management and Debt Repayment